There is always the option of a write in vote

 

There are enough names on the ballot, I dont need to write in another one.

 

You have got to be freaking kidding!!!!!! Google It. You'll get scores of results. I won't provide you with a link because I want you to see them all. You act like this is a big secret! I am astounded you have never heard of it! Absolutely astounded!

 

It is actually in contention.

And people who do not want to believe it can find links that support their bias.

Just look at Anon de Plume. He has been baiting people on this subject, on several threads, cause he has plenty of copy-pasta ready, to "prove" to us that Hillary Clinton as as lily-white as a virginal lamb.

The most common defenses I have seen are that Hillary Clinton has no direct authority over the operations of her foundation; that she herself has not collected money; and that Saudi Arabia has not made a contribution to the foundation since 2008.

To the first defense I say, PLEASE.

To the second defense I say that every power player since Brutus has had bagmen.

To the third defense I say that Saudi Arabia has a thousand proxies.

The point is, the Internet has plenty of disinformation for both sides. The only real proofs are to be found in Hillary's communications-- which she has deleted-- and in the Clinton Foundation's internal books-- which we will never see, as long as a Democrat runs the executive branch.

As always, it is the Fourth Estate -- the media -- that is dropping the ball here. The media is so deeply in the tank for Hillary Clinton that they have abrogated their civil contract. Investigative reporting has become a thing of the past, and the bias is so overwhelming that most Americans do not even know that this subject is in contention. To the people who dismiss the allegations of the Clinton Foundation as mere conspiracy and hate-mongering, I say: flip it. Imagine it were the Bush Foundation, or the Koch Foundation. And then try to imagine how much investigative media coverage it would receive.

 

You are proving yourself to be quite the blathering idiot. Saudi Arabia did not donate $50 million to the Clinton Campaign. Which makes you truly laughable. .

 

Open your eyes son...

 

Why do children ALWAYS resort to name calling? Do you know why? It is the only thing they have. However they will grow with experience which is a blessing...

 

If you can show me a link that proves the Saudis donated to the "Clinton Campaign" I will stand corrected and apologize. But if you can't you remain a blathering idiot that does not know what you are talking about.

 

https://dandelionsalad.wordpress.co...-arabia-russia-turkey-isis-and-the-dnc-leaks/

 

None of this says Saudi Arabia donated $50 million to the Clinton Campaign.

 

Well, that is a lie. I've never posted about Hillary taking money from anyone... And you should know that I don't copy and paste anything except links...

Truth-challenged a bit there aren't you, clarise...

 

Now you understand why I did not want to provide a link. I chose the most left wing website I could find AND you still deny. Like I said, when you really mature, you'll grow. I give up trying to help you youngsters to see the truth. You refuse to believe anything. Why so blind?

 

Why do you remain such a blathering idiot? Nothing in the link you posted says Saudi Arabia donated to the Clinton Campaign. And you get extra bonus points for being fool enough to believe that the most left wing websites are any more credible than the most right wing websites.

Just your usual hysterical bullshit.

 

If it true, where are the charges? If it is so easy to prove, then why not prosecute?

 

Have you watched the movie Clinton Cash, Stumbler?

 

Reality check here:

Has anyone claimed that the Clinton Campaign accepted money from Saudi Arabia?

I know I didn't.

 

Didn't bother reading the first post? While Smith was asking questions, he made it very clear that he believes that her CAMPAIGN has accepted money from foreign governments.

I'm sure you'll spin it to claim he never said those things...

 

"Some" of you people really have to start thinking for yourselves. Mr Smith merely desires everybody to research things and come to their OWN LOGICAL conclusion. I'm not trying to persuade you to believe what I say. That is why I like Randy, he reads all the info he can find and questions reasonably. We don't always agree but I know he has reasonably researched all the available info instead of just going along with the talking heads. M4M is another. They seek out all the info. After all that is what one expects from intelligent people.

 

Jesus.
What are you trying to do, give the joint some class?