1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. tenguy

    tenguy Reasoned voice of XNXX

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    56,083
    Homo? Are you
    calling me a homo?

    I'll come and snap your fucking neck.




    Or drop my pants, which ever turns you on.
     
  2. x__orion

    x__orion ::.unhomed.::

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    16,074
    He is only a disservice.
     
  3. baller16

    baller16 Porn Star Suspended!

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    41,561
    Nope, and I don't pretend to have. I know people who have. I respect every veteran, whether they volunteered or were drafted.

    That's why I don't respect those who PRETEND to have served and talk a bunch of shit and try to push others around.

    YOU'RE NOT CLEVER.
     
  4. x__orion

    x__orion ::.unhomed.::

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    16,074
    NEITHER ARE YOU.
     
  5. baller16

    baller16 Porn Star Suspended!

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    41,561
    Actually I really am :cool:
     
  6. x__orion

    x__orion ::.unhomed.::

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    16,074
    Prove it.
     
  7. tenguy

    tenguy Reasoned voice of XNXX

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    56,083
    So you are saying that you have some sort of proof that Richie's lying?
     
  8. baller16

    baller16 Porn Star Suspended!

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    41,561
    No. I've got nothing to prove. That's why I don't create threads to draw attention to myself or say anything that draws attention or will keep drama going unless it has been provoked in some way and is thus necessary.

    Nope, and I don't really care. For all I know, given his punk nature, if he did serve he probably committed war crimes to innocent people.
     
  9. Wafarer

    Wafarer Supreme Warlord Banned!

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    62,707
    Evening all!

    Hello miss Foxy,:rose: so true, I am not done yet, but feeling a little overwhelmed.:confused::rolleyes:

    Hey, too young to remember vinyl! Where do you think the word came from? England! We spell it like Englanders too, but don't make a big deal out of it.

    And for Bawler et al, `All brass and no brains" This is an oldie, but a goodie!:cool:As well he says `I don't create threads to call attention to myself' I don't remember the `wonderful, golden days of yore' here , but I can say that he gets his attention, through the age old art of hijacking threads, put downs, and twisting words.

    what, er wot?:p B.S. = Brit Slang;)


    Some thread, a mixed bag for sure! So many derailings we need a new terminus!
    -language: is "derailings" a real word? Not according to spell check on this site, hmmm

    A fight, in Philly, PA? Wow:eek: On another forum, CBS, there was a lot of this going on, the `fight' never happened. As we said to them, we want proof!
    Train/plane tickets, or pics! Put up or shut up!

    Twats, chods, fagots...oh my!:)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 5, 2010
  10. DanteAlighieri

    DanteAlighieri Porno Junky Suspended!

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    414
    Do you have evidence that you can read? I'm not sure how you could interpret my post as saying blacks were predisposed towards crime. What my post very clearly said was that those mocking DL for stating blacks were predisposed towards crime, had less evidence than he had that they were not. You asked me to prove they are predisposed to crime, I have one for you: prove they are not. You always get yourself into circular arguments yet you are somehow the last person to realize it. You ask what you assume to be a damning demand for proof as if you are playing a trump card, when all you are doing is sending out a card of invitation to another of your senseless circular discussions.

    DL's argument was that based on statistics blacks commit more crime and are therefore more privy to it than other races. Your argument(along with others) was that blacks are not more privy to crime, and while you have plenty of theories as to why they commit more crime, you actually have less facts supporting your politically correct assumption than he has supporting his politically incorrect one.

    Thusly, the main point is that neither side can prove that they are correct in absolutes, both sides are merely making assumptions. Yet when he makes an assumption based off statistics, you mock him; then you make an assumption based off "feelings" and assume this is somehow something better when it is obviously quite the opposite. I am not here to attack your argument, only the infantile way in which you and others choose to put it forward. Bother me no more with your education. :rolleyes:
     
  11. ShakeZula

    ShakeZula The Master Shake

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    13,649
    ManBitch does not make his points by using assumptions. He doesn't even say it's a hypothesis. He says declaratively that blacks are genetically predisposed to commit crimes. He has no evidence of this. And his hypothesis is not coming from a place rational examination of the evidence, his hypothesis is coming from the place of a racist. The same racists who said that blacks were too stupid to be free and that they were happy being slaves, that's what god made them for. This is why we attack him. Racists are never tolerated on this board. It's about the only behavior that the board universally condemns another for.

    I'm not saying they are not, I'm saying there is no reason to assume they are in the absence of evidence.

    And given current understanding of genetics, saying that there is some gene that only black people possess that predispose them to commit crimes is asinine. But we would expect this from a man who attempted to learn genetics from a man who wrote his book in 1947.

    -S-
     
  12. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    CHARLES R. DARWIN ON RACE

    You are refusing to draw obvious conclusions from my statistics, conclusions which are most certainly in my data.

    You mention creationism. Well, I have rarely read an attempt to refute The Bell Curve, or similar books and articles that did not read like a fundamentalist diatribe against Charles Darwin. Nevertheless, The Bell Curve is perfectly consistent with the theory of evolution. According to Charles Darwin, Charles Murray, and Richard Herrnstein what really matters are not acquired differences, but innate differences.

    This is what Darwin said about racial differences in The Origin of Species, and The Descent of Man:

    [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Univers, sans-serif]The variability or diversity of the mental faculties in men of the same race, not to mention the greater differences between the men of distinct races, is so notorious that not a word need here be said. [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Univers, sans-serif]

    Many races, some of which differ so much from each other, that they have often been ranked by naturalists as distinct species.
    [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Univers, sans-serif]

    At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world... The break between men and his nearest allies will then be wider.

    *not_secure_link*www.heretical.com/darwin/darwin4.html
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Univers, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, Univers, sans-serif]


    [/FONT]
    [/FONT]
     
  13. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    It gets tiresome to have to repeat myself. I have acknowledged that crime genes have not been discovered, but that I expect them to be. There is a difference between a hypothesis and something that has been proven beyond the shade of a reasonable doubt. You deliberately distort my arguments in order to make them easier to refute.

    What matters is that blacks everywhere but Bermuda - which I both drew attention to, and pointed out that Bermuda is too small to draw globally valid conclusions - blacks have high crime rates, and low average intelligence. These differences behave as though they are determined genetically.
     
  14. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    There is nothing in the rules of XNXX that prohibits the expression of opinions you consider to be "racist," especially when those opinions are as well documented as mine are.

    Liberals call for a dialogue on race. I agree that we need one, but not the dialogue the liberals want.
     
  15. ShakeZula

    ShakeZula The Master Shake

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    13,649
    The only obvious conclusion from your data is there is something going on in black communities. There is no obvious conclusion that a 'crime gene' has anything to do with it.

    Richard Dawkins refuses to debate creationists. Do you know why?

    Darwin, for all his brilliance, had no concept of DNA and genetics. Origin of Species was written in 1859. Mendal didn't even publish his work on heredity until 1865 and it took decades for it to even be accepted. The term 'gene' or 'genetics' did not even exist in Darwin's time.

    The whole concept of race itself is completely meaningless at a genetic level. This is why you're a complete and moron and nothing but racist ass-licker. You reject any modern understanding of genetics and what it might mean to your theory and base your ideas instead off of those from a man who based his ideas on nothing but conjecture as well. We had the barest understanding of DNA at the time he wrote his book but you take it as gospel because it gives you a shield to hide your despicable nature behind. You're not really a racist, you can tell people, your views on the inferiority of people of a certain skin color are just science.

    But you have no science supporting you, only the delusions of a man who wants so badly to parade around in a white robe but is afraid to admit it to himself.

    -S-
     
  16. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    Fallacy: Straw Man

    Here again you deliberately distort my opinions. This is known as The Straw Man Fallacy.

    ------

    The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:

    1. Person A has position X.
    2. Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
    3. Person B attacks position Y.
    4. Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
    This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself.

    *not_secure_link*www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html
     
  17. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    You do not prove that by asserting it.
     
  18. ShakeZula

    ShakeZula The Master Shake

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    13,649
    I didn't say it was a rule of the board, it's something that members never tolerate. Racists don't usually last long around here. You are especially pernicious, this is true, but you're still a racist. You're just as narcissistic as Monkey is in your own little ManBitch way. You continually tell yourself that those of us who attack your views and point out the inherent flaw in your logic are just persecuting you and that one day you will be vindicated. You've got a persecution complex. The more we point out just what a dumb fuck you are, the more you believe you're right.

    The only thing that is documented is a high crime rate. There is no documentation anywhere that even suggests this is due to genetics. You ignore or discount any by your own hypothesis because it's the one you want to be true. Not based on any rational explanation but as a way to protect yourself from the charge of racism.

    In all this time, I can recall you only ever pointing to The Bell Curve to support your racism. Where are the follow-up studies? Are their other books or published works that followed in that same path?

    -S-
     
  19. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,100
    The discovery of DNA and genes is consistent with what Darwin wrote.

    The belief that race is only a social construct is becoming a hallowed liberal dogma. Nevertheless, DNA tests can demonstrate that a person who appears to be of one race has a distant ancestor of another race.
     
  20. baller16

    baller16 Porn Star Suspended!

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    41,561
    DL, there is no crime gene. Blacks have a high crime rate for many reasons, one of them being that they've changed after being forced into the situations they were forced in. Politically correct people from the outside will never admit that but anybody who isn't on the outside looking in knows that it is true.

    Me and Dante were not arguing that you were correct. We were arguing that they were just as incorrect as you were, and their argument was based on feeling and being politcally correct.

    The hilarious thing is that the only way for them to discredit you is to admit that things like IQ tests measure knowledge and not intelligence and that their standards for measuring/judging intelligence do not at all measure or judge intelligence accurately.

    Hell, they don't even know what intelligence is.

    In other words, they would have to also discredit themselves and those they worship.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 5, 2010